Q: What is the Antarctic Impact Theory about?
A: The Antarctic Impact Theory suggests a comet impact in Antarctica around 12,800 years ago, leading to the breakup of a protocontinent and causing a series of global catastrophes, including rapid climate change, sea level rise, and mass extinctions.
Q: What is the Younger Dryas period?
A: The Younger Dryas period is a climatic event that occurred around 12,800 years ago, marked by rapid cooling and major changes in climate. The timing of the Younger Dryas aligns with the proposed Antarctic Impact Theory, suggesting the two could be connected.
Q: How are the extinction of Pleistocene mammals, mammoths encased in ice, and the Antarctic Impact Theory related?
A: The Antarctic Impact Theory could potentially explain the extinction of Pleistocene mammals and the existence of mammoths encased in ice in Siberia, as the comet impact could have caused massive climate and ecological changes leading to these phenomena.
Q: Can atmospheric nitrogen be linked to comet impacts, according to the Antarctic Impact Theory?
A: The theory suggests that the Earth’s atmospheric nitrogen could have originated from a nitrogen-rich comet that hit the Earth, as nitrogen would have sublimated from the comet and introduced into the Earth’s atmosphere.
Q: How do the Chinese flood epic and the biblical flood of Noah connect to the Antarctic Impact Theory?
A: The theory posits that the Chinese flood epic and the biblical flood of Noah could be connected by a common weather event,
Q: How do human memories and myths relate to the Antarctic Impact Theory?
A: Human memories and myths, such as the ones from the Basque people, Australian Aborigines, and other ancient cultures, could contain pieces of knowledge passed down through generations about the events related to the Antarctic Impact Theory.
Q: What are the implications of the Antarctic Impact Theory for primitive peoples living near the blast zone?
A: Primitive peoples, such as the Patagonia Indians and the Kalahari Bushmen, may have retained their primitive lifestyles due to their proximity to the blast zone, suggesting a connection between the impact and their way of life.
Q: How does the legend of Ragnarok connect to the Antarctic Impact Theory?
A: The legend of Ragnarok from Scandinavian cultures could represent their interpretation of the catastrophe caused by the comet impact, further supporting the Antarctic Impact Theory.
Q: What is the significance of the Basque language in relation to the Antarctic Impact Theory?
A: The Basque language, being unconnected to any other language on Earth, could indicate the ancientness of their culture and suggest that their legends about a great catastrophe may be related to the events described in the Antarctic Impact Theory.
Q: How do creation myths from different cultures potentially support the Antarctic Impact Theory?
A: Various creation myths, such as those of the Hopi people, the Australian Aborigines, and the Kuwia Indians, may reflect their ancestors’ experiences during the time of the impact, providing support for the theory.
Q: How might the legends of the Australian Aborigines relate to the Antarctic Impact Theory?
A: The Australian Aborigines’ legends, such as the one about Uluru (Ayers Rock) falling from the sky, could be interpreted as evidence of the impact event, as the massive monolith might have been a part of the protocontinent displaced by the comet’s collision.
Q: What is the potential connection between the Chinese flood myth and the Noah’s Ark story in relation to the Antarctic Impact Theory?
A: The Chinese flood myth and the Noah’s Ark story may be connected by a similar weather event triggered by the comet impact, suggesting that different cultures preserved memories of the same catastrophic event in their mythologies.
Q: How could the human memory and myths help validate the Antarctic Impact Theory?
A: The human memory and myths from various cultures might contain remnants of knowledge about the impact event, which, if analyzed and compared, could provide further evidence and support for the Antarctic Impact Theory.
Q: How does the Nitrogen Glacier on Pluto relate to the Antarctic Impact Theory?
A: The discovery of the Nitrogen Glacier on Pluto raises the possibility that Earth’s atmospheric nitrogen could have originated from a nitrogen-rich comet, potentially the one responsible for the Antarctic Impact.
Q: What are the implications of the Antarctic Impact Theory on the dating systems of ancient events and artifacts?
A: If the Antarctic Impact Theory is correct, the dating systems of ancient events and artifacts may need to be revised to accommodate the timeline of the impact event, approximately 12,800 years ago.
Q: Could advanced civilizations have existed before the impact, and what might have happened to them?
A: The Antarctic Impact Theory suggests that advanced civilizations may have existed before the impact, and those who knew about the event might have built shelters deep inside the Earth to survive. After the catastrophe, these survivors could have emerged and shared their knowledge with other human populations.
Q: What could the mammoths and mastodons encased in ice in Siberia tell us about the Antarctic Impact Theory?
A: The mammoths and mastodons found encased in ice in Siberia might suggest that a massive wave of ice and snow, potentially related to the comet impact, swept these creatures away from their grazing grounds, supporting the idea of a catastrophic event.
Q: How does the unique Basque language support the idea that the Basques might be survivors of the catastrophe?
A: The Basque language is ancient and unconnected to any other language on Earth. This uniqueness could indicate the ancientness of their culture, and their legends about surviving a great catastrophe might provide further evidence of their connection to the impact event.
Q: How can the Antarctic Impact Theory explain the primitive lifestyles of some indigenous peoples close to the blast zone?
A: The primitive lifestyles of indigenous peoples like the Patagonia Indians or the Kalahari Bushmen might be a result of their proximity to the blast zone of the comet impact, suggesting a connection between the event and their retained primitive ways of living.
Q: What is the significance of the number 10,000 years in relation to the legends of various indigenous cultures?
A: The number 10,000 years appears in several indigenous cultures’ legends, such as those of the Papua New Guineans and the Cahuilla Indians. This recurring number could suggest a shared memory of the time since the catastrophic event, supporting the Antarctic Impact Theory.
Q: Could the legends of Ragnarok in Scandinavian cultures be another representation of the comet impact?
A: The legends of Ragnarok in Scandinavian cultures might be another way of expressing the catastrophic comet impact event, suggesting that this memory has been preserved in various cultural mythologies worldwide.
Q: What might be the role of the “strangers” appearing in historical records of cultures across the globe?
A: These “strangers” might be survivors of the impact who possessed advanced knowledge before the catastrophe. They could have emerged from their shelters and shared their knowledge with other human populations, helping to rebuild and advance human civilization after the event.
Q: How does the Antarctic Impact Theory explain the high concentration of atmospheric nitrogen on Earth?
A: The Antarctic Impact Theory suggests that a nitrogen-rich comet could have delivered Earth’s atmosheric nitrogen when it struck our planet. The nitrogen would have sublimated, turning into gas and becoming a significant part of Earth’s atmosphere.
Q: What is the significance of the legends of the Aboriginal people of Australia in relation to the Antarctic Impact Theory?
A: Aboriginal legends, such as the belief that Uluru (Ayers Rock) fell from the sky, could indicate that the monolith is a piece of the protocontinent that was launched into the air during the impact event, further supporting the Antarctic Impact Theory.
Q: What connections can be made between the Great Flood legends in Chinese and Biblical records and the Antarctic Impact Theory?
A: The Great Flood legends in both Chinese and Biblical records might be connected to a common weather event caused by the comet impact, suggesting that these flood myths might be another way human memory has preserved the knowledge of the catastrophic event.
Q: How does the Antarctic Impact Theory explain the sudden climate change at the end of the last Ice Age?
A: The Antarctic Impact Theory proposes that the comet impact could have triggered the sudden climate change at the end of the last Ice Age, causing a rapid melting of ice sheets and a dramatic shift in global temperatures.
Q: Can the Antarctic Impact Theory account for the existence of large glacial lakes in North America?
A: The Antarctic Impact Theory can explain the formation of large glacial lakes in North America, as the rapid melting of ice sheets caused by the comet impact would have released massive amounts of water, forming these enormous lakes in the process.
Q: How might the Antarctic Impact Theory explain the existence of mammoths and mastodons encased in ice in Siberia?
A: The theory suggests that a wave of ice and snow, potentially resulting from the comet impact, could have swept these large mammals away from their grazing grounds and piled them up in Siberia, leading to their preservation in ice.Q: How does the concept of a cosmic wind relate to the Antarctic Impact Theory?
A: The cosmic wind concept proposes that in addition to comets, there may have been a powerful wind associated with the impact event. Comparing it to a terrestrial hailstorm might help in understanding the potential effects and implications of such an event.
Q: Can the nitrogen content of Earth’s atmosphere be linked to the Antarctic Impact Theory?
A: It’s possible that the Earth’s atmospheric nitrogen (78% of the atmosphere) was delivered by a nitrogen-rich comet. If a nitrogenized comet were to impact Earth, it could release nitrogen gas, potentially explaining Earth’s high nitrogen concentration.
Q: How might the Antarctic Impact Theory tie in with the legends of Ragnarok in Scandinavian culture?
A: Ragnarok, a catastrophic event in Norse mythology, might represent a cultural memory of the same cataclysmic event as the Antarctic Impact Theory. This connection suggests that various cultures around the world may have preserved memories of this global event in their myths and legends.
Q: In the context of the Antarctic Impact Theory, what could Uluru, also known as Ayers Rock, represent for Australian Aborigines?
A: According to Aboriginal legends, Uluru fell from the sky. The Antarctic Impact Theory could suggest that Uluru might be a fragment of the protocontinent that was dislodged during the comet impact, lending some credibility to the Aboriginal legends.